Thanks to the rise of neo-liberalism from 1972 onward, the idea of doing things for the common good (often with government resources) has fallen on hard times. The idea of self-reliance and “pulling yourself up” plays very well to hard working Americans (the world’s most productive people) and the idea that to function in society, someone should go out, find a job or start a business, ply a trade and provide for themselves. I’m sure that even reading that statement rings true. We’re taught it from when we’re very young that life is work and work is life and that we are individually responsible for our successes and failures and providing for ourselves and our families.
However, I would posit a different idea. And that is this, in the course of being responsible for our own actions we also have some responsibility to those around us and to the greater society in which we exist. That there are moments and times where we need to take common action that benefits everyone and that actually raises all boats in a quantifiable way that we can see and measure. People can be employed, equipment can be purchased, and benefits that everyone can enjoy can all be outs with common ownership. I think that one of the biggest problems that we have in our modern society is excess privatization. The concept of common ownership is not a new concept. In the 19th century education in many rural communities was a common venture by the local parents. Land-grant colleges were a national program to create chances for skilled education for American men and women who wanted to advance in society. Many of those schools have created amazing people and advancements that we continue to rely on.
A libertarian future where everything is based on a services
“what you can pay for” basis is not positive for most people.
It works out well for a precious few leaving most of us out in the cold.
Think of all the things that we as a society own in common:
Public Education
Roads, Bridges, and other Infrastructure
Open Space, Parks, Recreation Facilities
Public Transportation (in most cases)
We could enable people to create businesses and live good lives if we brought more things back into common ownership like electricity, water districts, and gas lines. Even bringing the lines that power the internet into the commons can solve problems like internet neutrality and bottlenecks. In the Middle Ages, one of the few chances to advance under manorialism was through taking advantage of land held in common on which you could raise livestock or make products to sell at an open market. Giving people a chance to do something similar could solve a variety of problems. The micro-housing movement can solve homelessness and those houses can be held in the commons. That way, if anyone finds themselves homeless they know that the micro-houses are there for them.
Privatization of almost everything has rarely brought the promises that it was sold on. Everyone thought they were voting for a future where competition and lower prices would thrive but in many cases like gas and electricity people ended up with Monopoly anyway. If there is going to be a monopoly, it might as well by owned by the people who can benefit from it and not simply line of the pockets of a corporation who will seek to reduce profits to increase return to their investors.
We can create more together than apart.
This is the real message of common ownership. When resources aren’t going to line the pockets of the wealthy then everyone benefits. I’m not saying that we need to outlaw wealth or wealthy people but things that everyone uses and things that everyone needs to live should be owned by the same people to keep prices down and to keep it working in a way that is beneficial for everyone. A dog-eat-dog society where everyone is out for himself leads to the kind of public violence that we now see and leads to the struggle we see in government. People have forgotten that civilization is, by its very nature, a grouping together of individuals who create a collective sovereignty. When the people want to take an action, great things are possible. This concept is the antithesis to the private corporation that is legally bound to make a return to its investors. Would it not be better to invest those resources in things that we all can use?
That’s the kind of trickle down that will actually trickle!
In an environment where certain things are owned in commons by everyone; we can seek out ways to help people live good lives and not just pay to exist as many a libertarians would like. We are a society of individuals as much as we are a common people. If we can create an environment through common ownership where are the individuals can do well then we have a functioning society. What we have now is people who are taking advantage of people for their own individual gain because their only thought is for themselves and not for how people will be affected or what this will do to greater society. It is time to think about the civic impact and to build an actual society, not merely a nation of individuals who happen to share some geography. I’m acutely aware that there are those who promote globalization who want exactly that but it does not make for a great society or even a great environment to live in. As long as people live in certain places, we need to make sure that we can all live well and that takes vision and grouping our resources together. Common ownership is a pathway to do just that.
Discover more from The Cameron Journal
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.



